A silent chemical assault is underway. A new nationwide study has revealed that children in the United States — especially toddlers aged two to four — are regularly exposed to dozens of industrial chemicals during their most vulnerable developmental years. Many of these chemicals are not even on the radar of public health monitoring systems.
The study, published in Environmental Science & Technology, tested urine samples from 201 young children as part of the NIH-supported Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program. Researchers screened for 111 chemicals commonly found in household items, plastics, food packaging, cosmetics, and furniture.
Related: why glass is emitting more microplastics than plastic bottles
What they found is deeply unsettling: 96 chemicals were detected in at least five children. 48 were found in more than half. 34 were found in over 90% of the children — including 9 not tracked in national health databases like NHANES.
“These are not rare or accidental exposures,” said Deborah H. Bennett, the study’s lead author and professor of public health at UC Davis. “This is a daily, invisible flood of chemicals entering the bodies of children at a stage when their brains and immune systems are still forming.”
The Toxic Alphabet of Modern Childhood

Dollar Store toys emit dangerous toxins. So does gum.
Phthalates and phthalate alternatives – Found in toys, food wrap, vinyl flooring, and shampoo
Parabens – Used in creams, cosmetics, and even medications
Bisphenols (BPA, BPS) – Found in plastic containers, canned food linings, and receipts
Benzophenones – Common in sunscreens and cosmetics
Pesticide residues, flame retardants, and combustion byproducts – Lurking in food, furniture, and air
Children are especially vulnerable. Their smaller bodies mean higher exposures per kilogram, and behaviors like crawling, mouthing toys, and touching floors mean they are constantly in contact with contaminated surfaces. In some cases, the children’s chemical loads were higher than their mothers’ levels during pregnancy, pointing to postnatal environmental sources — the home, the daycare, the playground.

Plastics and toxins in toddlers
Related: the problems of Dollar Store plastic
The data also revealed disturbing patterns: Chemical exposures were highest among younger toddlers and racial/ethnic minorities, reflecting systemic environmental injustice. While some older chemicals like triclosan and certain phthalates are decreasing (likely due to public pressure and reformulations), new unregulated substitutes like DINCH and emerging pesticides are on the rise.
Swapping out banned chemicals for understudied alternatives is what scientists call “regrettable substitution.” It’s regulation on a delay — and children are paying the price.
What Can Parents Do to Reduce the Toxic Burden?

Anthroposophic, Waldorf School toys by Bella Luna are made from wood and natural paint
While we can’t control every exposure, there are concrete steps caregivers can take:
Avoid plastics labeled #3, #6, and #7, which may contain bisphenols and phthalates
Buy “paraben-free” and “fragrance-free” personal care products. Buy or make your own food wraps from fabric scraps and beeswax. Package lunches and food in steel, not plastic containers.

The Homesteading Family makes beeswax wraps for sandwiches at school and play
Ventilate homes, dust with a damp cloth, and consider buying air cleaners with HEPA filters
Wash hands before meals, especially after outdoor play or contact with plastic items
Limit pesticide exposure — wash produce well and consider organic options when possible
A Call for Chemical Accountability
Ultimately, this is not just a parenting issue. It’s a policy failure. Most of the 40,000+ chemicals used in consumer products in the U.S. are poorly regulated, with minimal long-term health data.
As Green Prophet has reported before, environmental chemicals are linked to declining fertility, disrupted hormones, obesity, and neurodevelopmental disorders — all of which are now rising in childhood populations.
“This study should sound the alarm,” said Jiwon Oh, postdoctoral scholar and co-author of the study. “We urgently need better biomonitoring, stronger chemical safety laws, and corporate transparency. Our children shouldn’t be the test subjects for industrial shortcuts.”
This is a pivotal moment. Conscious parents and policymakers alike have the opportunity — and the obligation — to push for a healthier future. Because these chemicals aren’t just in the air or water — they’re in our children. And that makes this not just a science story, but a moral one.





