Microplastics are in your gum
As microplastics clog our oceans and nanoplastics infiltrate the cells of marine life, the world inches closer to a pivotal moment. The final round of negotiations on a United Nations global plastics treaty is scheduled to take place this fall, amid mounting scientific evidence that plastic pollution is spiraling out of control — and that mere recycling will not solve the crisis.
The urgency couldn’t be clearer. A Nature editorial this month underscores that if current trends persist, annual plastic production could double by 2050. And while the volume of discarded plastic continues to climb, so too does the evidence of its insidious reach into ecosystems and human health.
Related: teens exposed to microplastics through plastic aligners
Two new studies published in Nature this week hammer the point home. One revealed that nanoplastics — particles smaller than 1 micrometre — have now entered ocean food chains at their foundation. “These are able to pass through cell walls, meaning that they are already incorporated into the ocean phytoplankton which serve as the base of the marine food web,” said Canadian environmental scientist Tony Walker in a comment shared with press.
The second study mapped the industrial pipeline of plastic production and uncovered over 4,200 “chemicals of concern” — compounds used in plastic manufacturing that are toxic, persistent, or otherwise harmful to the environment and human health. These substances range from plasticizers and flame retardants to processing aids, many of which lack comprehensive safety data.
The stakes are high for the UN’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC), which will convene for its fifth and final session. While nearly 180 countries have signaled support for a binding global agreement, deep divisions remain. A bloc of oil-producing nations — led by countries with major petrochemical interests — is pushing for a narrow focus on waste management and recycling, sidestepping more aggressive proposals to limit virgin plastic production.
Meanwhile, a coalition including the European Union, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom is advocating for upstream solutions — namely reducing production at the source and establishing enforceable global rules around plastic additives, design, and transparency.
In parallel to the UN process, smaller alliances are taking shape. In April 2024, a group of 60 countries formed the High Ambition Coalition to End Plastic Pollution, vowing to eliminate plastic leakage into nature by 2040 and back a robust, legally binding treaty with specific reduction targets.
Whether that ambition is reflected in the final text remains to be seen. As Nature warns, if negotiators fail to reach consensus, “there is a real risk that nations will go their own way,” creating a patchwork of rules that may be less effective and harder to enforce.
Still, the science is no longer ambiguous. Plastic is no longer just littering beaches — it’s in the rain, the food, in our brains, and now, the very cells of the ocean’s smallest life forms. As the world prepares for the final treaty talks, the question is no longer whether action is needed, but whether global leaders will agree on what that action should be.
Countries resisting plastic production caps:
-
Saudi Arabia: One of the world’s largest oil producers and petrochemical exporters. Has argued that the treaty should not restrict plastic production, but instead promote improved waste management and recycling.
-
Russia. Also a major oil and gas exporter. Has aligned with producer countries pushing for national-level flexibility and voluntary commitments.
-
Iran. As a petrostate, Iran supports the position that plastic production is a national economic matter and should not be capped internationally.
-
China. While complex, China has often sided with production-heavy interests in past rounds. It is the largest plastic producer in the world and may resist enforceable limits on production. However, China also supports some international coordination on pollution control, especially through waste trade restrictions.
Author: Karin Kloosterman
Karin Kloosterman is an award-winning journalist, innovation strategist, and founder of Green Prophet, one of the Middle East’s pioneering sustainability platforms. She has ranked in the Top 10 of Verizon innovation competitions, participated in NASA-linked challenges, and spoken worldwide on climate, food security, and future resilience. With an IoT technology patent, features in Canada’s National Post, and leadership inside teams building next-generation agricultural and planetary systems — including Mars-farming concepts — Karin operates at the intersection of storytelling, science, and systems change. She doesn’t report on the future – she helps design it. Reach out directly to [email protected]
