Zoology researchers Roi Holzman and Victor China at Tel Aviv University weren’t the first to notice that more than 90 percent of fish larvae die in the wild, and that more than 99 percent of fish won’t live to reach maturity. They are the first however, they believe, to explain why this is happening –– and their research could help conservationists and fish farmers give fish a fighting chance on fish farms and in the wild.
The research was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Combining biology with physics, the two researchers uncovered a process called hydrodynamic starvation. Their studies show that most baby fish are destined to die because they are unable to feed from their environment due to a process limited by the physics of water.
“Unlike mammals, most fish release eggs and sperm externally in the water. There is almost no maternal care. The fertilized eggs drift to the ocean where the larvae hatch,” Holzman tells ISRAEL21c. “In the beginning they have no mouth and feed off their yolk sac. Once they start feeding, most of them start dying. Within two weeks, over 90% of the larvae have died. This phenomenon has been known for over a century.
Multiple hypotheses over the years have speculated that the problem stems from pollution, drifting, unsuitable habitats, lack of food, predation or disease, he explains.
But even under the best conditions, even fish that are reared for aquaponics, at least 70% of newly hatched fish still die. For example, the Tel Aviv researchers found that at Har Dag, a veteran fish farm in Eilat, typically 250,000 larvae survive from one million hatched eggs.
Something’s fishy
“It’s obviously something else that is happening here. There are no predators, they don’t drift and they have plenty to eat,” says Holzman. “I started thinking about this problem four years ago and yet found no one who had come up with a good answer. In research, your best commodity is your question, not your answer.”
What Holzman and his colleagues discovered is linked to the physics of small things. There is an interaction of fish bodies and their surrounding fluid, and this interaction changes with size.
Due to weak electric signals between a body and the water, a small layer of water sticks to the surface and gets dragged around with the fish. We don’t feel this when we dive into the water because humans are so much bigger than fish larvae. But this layer lies heavy on the tiny larvae.
“When you are small you drag a proportionately huge layer of water around with you, which changes the way organisms feed and swim. When you are very small you can’t use fins or a propeller, but swim with a screw-like instrument called flagella,” Holzman explains.
This business of swimming with flagella can get sticky and can prevent a small larva from opening its mouth to generate a flow of water carrying in prey.
“This mode of feeding can fail,” says Holzman, who set up an experiment that increased the viscosity of water, using dextran, showing how even bigger, more successful larvae can fail at feeding, and then fail to thrive.
Honey, we shrunk the fish
“We showed that in these conditions the bigger larvae behave and feed like the small ones. Like the movie Honey, I Shrunk the Kids, we took old larvae and made them feel tiny again. They failed to feed because of the high viscosity in the water. They were not adapted under these circumstances,” says Holzman.
They put all the experiments on film, which was no easy task as the larvae are three to four millimeters long and almost transparent. Their mouths are about 100 to 200 microns in size, and take a quick 20 milliseconds to open and close.
Holzman is reasonably sure that fish larvae die off not from pollution, but a survival mechanism inherent in nature: “The whole reproduction mode is coping with the loss of so many, like sperm production in human males.
“But I think there is an edge here. If this is the system, we can think about what we can do artificially to increase survival to get better products when doing agriculture [like fish farming or aquaponics] – to increase growth rates.”
He thinks that overfishing, rather than hydrodynamic starvation, is the simple reason why fish populations have crashed globally.
Next, the scientific community may be able to apply Holzman and China’s finding to figure out ways to improve the odds for fish around the world.
This story first appeared on ISRAEl21c – www.israel21c.org
Author: Karin Kloosterman
Karin Kloosterman is an award-winning journalist and publisher that founded Green Prophet to unite a prosperous Middle East. She shows through her work that positive, inspiring dialogue creates action that impacts people, business and planet. She has published in thought-leading newspapers and magazines globally, owns an IoT tech chip patent, and is part of teams that build world-changing products to make agriculture and our planet more sustainable. Reach out directly to [email protected]
This is an interesting finding and since water has a set viscosity that cannot be lowered (only increased as in the dextran experiment), it still begs the question how the 1% (or 25% in the Har Dag environment) still manage to get enough food under the very same circumstances. Now, under the evolutionary framework of explaining things, this would suggest that these 1% to 25% (in a more benign environment) are the better “fit for survival”. And natural selection already does its best to let them mate and procreate to begin a new generation of fish that then survives at a rate of, say, 2% in the wild and 26% in aquaponics (and counting). Clearly we have not observed this over the past millennia or the problem would have disappeared by now. Nor would this have been sustainable: the fish would have been so populous as to die from starvation at adult age. So until no good reason is forthcoming how the remaining 1% or 25% survive under the exact same circumstances and since selection (i.e. breeding) does not seem to shift that ratio there seems to be another “moderating” variable at play which yet resists detection.