<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Don&#8217;t be Fooled by Saudi Aramco&#8217;s LEED Platinum Tower	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.greenprophet.com/2013/08/saudi-aramco-leed-platinum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.greenprophet.com/2013/08/saudi-aramco-leed-platinum/</link>
	<description>Sustainably Driven. Future Ready.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 23:39:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James Avery		</title>
		<link>https://www.greenprophet.com/2013/08/saudi-aramco-leed-platinum/#comment-1053858</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Avery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 23:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenprophet.com/?p=97523#comment-1053858</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The award is based on the building, not the occupier. By extension, you could say that the much documented Gasunie building in Groningen shouldn&#039;t be quoted as an example of organic architecture, because it was built for an oil and gas company, and we should also exclude any buildings funded by oil related benefactors.

I don&#039;t think that&#039;s a sound reason to say that the ratings systems are flawed. However, it is certainly fair game to ask about the settings in which these building are constructed. How are most of the occupants going to get to and from this building? Until more cities in the Gulf start adopting layouts similar to that used in Masdar, even the most &quot;efficient&quot; of them are still going to have a huge energy footprint.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The award is based on the building, not the occupier. By extension, you could say that the much documented Gasunie building in Groningen shouldn&#8217;t be quoted as an example of organic architecture, because it was built for an oil and gas company, and we should also exclude any buildings funded by oil related benefactors.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a sound reason to say that the ratings systems are flawed. However, it is certainly fair game to ask about the settings in which these building are constructed. How are most of the occupants going to get to and from this building? Until more cities in the Gulf start adopting layouts similar to that used in Masdar, even the most &#8220;efficient&#8221; of them are still going to have a huge energy footprint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tafline Laylin &#124; Sneak Peak at World’s Largest Women-Only University in Saudi Arabia		</title>
		<link>https://www.greenprophet.com/2013/08/saudi-aramco-leed-platinum/#comment-204918</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tafline Laylin &#124; Sneak Peak at World’s Largest Women-Only University in Saudi Arabia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenprophet.com/?p=97523#comment-204918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] registered with the USGBC mostly in search of LEED Gold certification, which doubled the number of LEED projects in the Kingdom at the time that they were [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] registered with the USGBC mostly in search of LEED Gold certification, which doubled the number of LEED projects in the Kingdom at the time that they were [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
