<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: RAFAA Designs Next Generation Solar Tower for Bright Source Competition	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.greenprophet.com/2011/08/rafaa-bright-source-solar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.greenprophet.com/2011/08/rafaa-bright-source-solar/</link>
	<description>Sustainably Driven. Future Ready.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:20:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James Toscas		</title>
		<link>https://www.greenprophet.com/2011/08/rafaa-bright-source-solar/#comment-21137</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Toscas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenprophet.com/?p=52668#comment-21137</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think these designs are aesthetically beautiful.  However, I don&#039;t understand how it could be concluded that the steel option is &quot;more economical and more sustainable&quot; than the concrete solution.  Making such a judgment requires a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); it&#039;s not so simple as noting that &quot;steel can be recycled&quot; (of course, so can concrete).  

PCI has conducted comparative LCAs, and I can tell you that there are many details that must be studied for an application like this.  How much energy and environmental impact would be associated with coating and periodically re-coating a steel tower over its lifetime to prevent corrosion?  How much fabrication energy would be used simply to introduce the helical twist in the steel tower?  What about using concrete made with little or no Portland cement (a main source of concrete&#039;s energy and CO2 impact)?  

I suggest that builders of such towers consult with competent representatives of the steel and concrete engineering communities who have performed the appropriate LCA studies, and not rely only on the opinion of RAFAA, in deciding which option to use.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these designs are aesthetically beautiful.  However, I don&#8217;t understand how it could be concluded that the steel option is &#8220;more economical and more sustainable&#8221; than the concrete solution.  Making such a judgment requires a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); it&#8217;s not so simple as noting that &#8220;steel can be recycled&#8221; (of course, so can concrete).  </p>
<p>PCI has conducted comparative LCAs, and I can tell you that there are many details that must be studied for an application like this.  How much energy and environmental impact would be associated with coating and periodically re-coating a steel tower over its lifetime to prevent corrosion?  How much fabrication energy would be used simply to introduce the helical twist in the steel tower?  What about using concrete made with little or no Portland cement (a main source of concrete&#8217;s energy and CO2 impact)?  </p>
<p>I suggest that builders of such towers consult with competent representatives of the steel and concrete engineering communities who have performed the appropriate LCA studies, and not rely only on the opinion of RAFAA, in deciding which option to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
