Why the Middle East Should Definitely Support America’s Keystone XL Pipeline Protests

350.org, Keystone XL Pipeline Protests, Bill McKibben, D.C. environmental activism, carbon emissions,Bill McKibben isn’t the kind of guy who takes getting arrested lightly. He’s doing it to save humanity from one of the most catastrophic dangers we have ever faced.

The right wing has long maintained that America should reduce its oil dependency on the Middle East. Considered the root of the last war in Iraq and a compelling reason for Gaddafi to hold on so tightly to power over Libya’s oil fields, Republicans have pushed through a series of catastrophic measures to secure their own oil supplies in the United States. But this time, some of the country’s most respected scientists and environmental activists are risking arrest to fight the latest such folly.

Fast-tracked for presidential approval by the Energy and Power Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Panel, the $7 billion Keystone XL Pipeline poses one of the greatest dangers humanity has ever experienced. The 1500 mile pipeline would transport heavy crude oil (or bitumen) evacuated from Northern Alberta’s tar sands to Texas refineries. If burned, this heavy crude oil would release up to 82% more carbon emissions into our atmosphere than conventional oil. More emissions = more erratic climate changes = worsening quality of life for everyone. One hundred and fifty protestors have already been arrested in Washington D.C., where they are putting pressure on President Obama to make good on the promises that got him elected.

The man America elected in 2008

The man who convinced the American public while campaigning for President that he would fight to clean up the country’s appalling environmental record but has since signed off an array of ruinous coal and oil exploration projects, Obama has to approve the bill that would allow TransCanada to build a pipeline that scientists say would set off a massive carbon bomb.

Second only to China, America produces more carbon emissions than any other country (though the UAE produces more per capita.) And the American dream of having more cars than any one family needs, eating an endless supply of food shipped across the world, and wearing the fanciest clothes stitched together by poor people living in substandard conditions has encouraged many developing countries to pursue a similar model. None of this can happen without oil and most of us are completely hooked.

Oil addiction

This relentless addiction to oil has given multi-billion dollar corporations the perfect excuse to pursue increasingly-risky (and profitable) programs to supply the demand that has pushed carbon levels in our atmosphere well beyond the 350 parts per million that scientists agree is safe for earth. This addiction is also behind the devastating famine in East Africa, rising temperatures in the Middle East, and floods in Pakistan that displaced millions of people.

But if President Obama approves the Keystone XL Pipeline, we will beg to have today’s comparatively comfortable weather patterns returned to us.

World-renowned climatologist Jim Hanson explains that if Alberta’s 300 billion barrels of tar sands oil are released into the earth’s atmosphere, we are effectively signing our own death sentence. Since we share an atmosphere, President Obama has the power in his hands, right now, to decide whether we in the Middle East (and others in Europe, Africa, Antarctica, South America, and Australia) have a future. That’s a lot of pressure to put on one man.

The weight of the world

It would be an easy call if  special interest groups and the right wing weren’t holding a political gun to the President’s head. Politically, Democrats risk seeming weak on domestic security if they don’t approve this pipeline, but we’ve seen in the Middle East that environmental pressures will eventually create even more serious security risks.

Consider the economic insecurity associated with stronger hurricanes (Irene is heading for the East Coast as we go to press), more drought in Texas, an equally dry Mexico and subsequent influx of desperate immigrants. And what of the country’s nuclear power plants, two of which were shut down after yesterday’s earthquake in Virginia that was felt as far north as Toronto, Canada? Do we want another Fukushima disaster on our hands?

Oil industry people will worry about the loss of income that would result from an energy independent America, a valid concern, except China will be happy to step in and buy up all of our oil. That’s not enough to convince leaders in the Middle East to pressure Obama to make the right decision. But climate change should.

Jordan and Yemen are running out of water. Israel will rely almost exclusively on desalination in the next two years, and the UAE and other Gulf countries already do. These are just a few of the problems we have to confront as a warming planet wreaks havoc on our climate. Each year, we set new records for high temperatures in a region that is already almost unbearable during summer. Do we really want TransAmerica Pipeline, other rich oil barrens, and the American right to decide an even more miserable future for us?

1.15 Billion tons of CO2

The Guardian reports that the Australian Government released a study called the Critical Decade Report which showed that humanity has a chance of surviving if we can keep this century’s carbon emissions below 1 trillion tons. Just 20% into the decade, and we have already released 300 billion tons or 30% beyond what is sustainable (and continue to produce more oil-hungry humans at an exponential pace). In 50 years, the Keystone XL Pipeline alone is expected to release a further 1.15 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere, so that Americans don’t have to pay reasonably high prices at the gas pump, eat less food, or focus their collective attention on developing renewable energy alternatives.

Bill McKibben from 350.org, who we have interviewed on Green Prophet, is behind one of the largest civil disobedience efforts to take hold of America in far too long. He and other career scientists have been arrested for blocking a road to the White House to urge President Obama to reject the Keystone XL Pipeline.

One has to think: what would cause hundreds of America’s most reserved and studious citizens to risk having a criminal record? Probably only something incredibly serious. We ought to take note, and we ought to give them our support.

More on 350.org and the fight to curtail carbon emissions:

Interview: Bracing for a Warmer Future with Bill McKibben

The Middle East’s Carbon Emissions at a Glance

Israel Plans to Combat Carbon Emissions

image via transition voice

Facebook Comments
Tafline Laylin
Author: Tafline Laylin

As a tour leader who led “eco-friendly” camping trips throughout North America, Tafline soon realized that she was instead leaving behind a trail of gas fumes, plastic bottles and Pringles. In fact, wherever she traveled – whether it was Viet Nam or South Africa or England – it became clear how inefficiently the mandate to re-think our consumer culture is reaching the general public. Born in Iran, raised in South Africa and the United States, she currently splits her time between Africa and the Middle East. Tafline can be reached at tafline (at) greenprophet (dot) com.

Comments

comments

Get featured on Green Prophet Send us tips and news:[email protected]

8 thoughts on “Why the Middle East Should Definitely Support America’s Keystone XL Pipeline Protests”

  1. Murtaza says:

    Re: Matthew:

    Probably for many Muslims, the issue of the tar sands and the Keystone XL pipeline has not become truly a moral issue for them (and how can it when so many imams today, for examples, drive gas-guzzling cars, or use recyclable resources without recycling, without having the least hesitation about their environmental and political contribution to society’s disease). Other Muslims, perhaps those set to be particularly affected by the pipeline, whether by being displaced or by having their community or livelihood threatened, or perhaps simply because they’re aware of what’s at stake for the planet overall, *want* to do something, but perhaps are caught up with concerns over Islamophobia in America, or are otherwise just struggling to find their place in society, that they don’t feel comfortable rocking the boat.

    So I think activists like you are rare among Muslims in America, but there need to be more. Thanks for sharing your article… here are two others related to Keystone XL (though by now there are many, of course):

    Agency Struggles to Safeguard Pipeline System: Pipeline Spills Put Safeguards Under Scrutiny
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/10/business/energy-environment/agency-struggles-to-safeguard-pipeline-system.html?_r=1

    Keystone Pipeline Could Push Endangered Whooping Crane Into Extinction
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leda-huta/keystone-pipeline-could-p_b_947132.html

  2. Matthew Naim Abdulla says:

    Here’s my article on American Muslim participation in the tar sands protest:

    http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/american-muslim-youth-and-the-tar-sands-we-want-a-bright-future-not-a-black

  3. Larry says:

    Hey, people, I apologize for my correlation remark. It wasn’t in good taste. I’m sure all kinds of folk were protesting. So much for freedom of speech and assembly, as granted in the US Constitution.

  4. Murtaza says:

    “Looks like another protest group of “environmentalists” and vegan vegetarians”

    Larry: this isn’t just another protest of environmentalists and “vegan vegetarians”. It’s gathering momentum from people of all walks of life, because people of all walks of life would be affected by this pipeline. Activists, actors, politicians, old men and women, farmers, those who live near the pipeline route and those who don’t, all types of people seem to be gathering together around this cause. Many of them aren’t even environmentalists, I believe, but are doing this because it just makes sense to them. While environmentalists are concerned about the huge effect on the climate it would have to release the carbon from this massive carbon pool into the atmosphere, many of the protestors are simply concerned that the pipeline would disrupt and destroy their homes, communities, and contaminate their sources of water. This is almost sure to happen since TransCanada has a record of being “reliably unreliable” with how it handled a precursor pipeline that leaked 12 times in 12 months despite TransCanada’s claim that it would leak only once every several years. So despite what you may think of it, this issue is simply a matter of common sense.

    “Larry, this may be one of the most ill-informed responses I’ve seen on Green Prophet to date.”

    Tafline: it’s okay, the important thing is that he’s talking about it! 🙂

    PS: apparently 322 people have been arrested to date, and the number seems to be increasing at a rate of ~50 persons per day!

  5. Arwa Aburawa says:

    Thanks for this really important article… If some people can’t understand the scale of this issue and what is at stake than I despair for this human race…

    1. That is exactly the thought that I had Arwa… looking forward to seeing you in Liverpool next week 🙂

  6. Larry says:

    Looks like another protest group of “environmentalists” and vegan vegetarians

    1. Larry, this may be one of the most ill-informed responses I’ve seen on Green Prophet to date.

Comments are closed.