The Best Way To Preserve Water? Make It More Expensive

water-cost-conservation-jordan-agriculture-efficiencyAccording to a report by the International Water Association, the low price of water is the main factor preventing water conservation in rural Jordan

These days it seems that the only way to change people’s attitudes is to hit them where it hurts them most- their bank balance. Unless it makes economic sense, it’s pretty difficult to get people to assess and change their deep-rooted habits. For example, I have tried for years to convince people to give up their cars but until the recession hit, I was having very little luck.

Now I know three people who have given up their cars simply because they can’t afford them. High taxes on alcohol and cigarettes also encourage us to reconsider (or moderate) our unhealthy addictions but should upping the price of water be a real consideration when looking at water conservation?

Jordan’s Irrigation Agriculture uses 75% of water

According to the latest report by the International Water Association (IWA), the price of water is an important factor when it comes to water preservation. In Jordan, which is considered to be the fourth most water-poor nation in the world, inefficient farming and irrigation practices mean that water (which is increasingly precious) is being wasted on a huge scale.

For example, the irrigated agricultural sector consumes 75% of Jordan’s water whilst only contributing 4% to the national income. In response to this, the IWA have stated that pushing up the price of water used for irrigation would provide an important economic incentive to encourage farmers to become more water efficient.

Save Water For The Rising Population

The IWA then go on to reason that the water saved could be supplied to consumers in Jordan- in particularly Amman- where demand is rising.  Whilst I was initially against putting up the price of water as it may affect people’s access, there does appear to be logic in the IWA’s arguments.

A price hike on water for irrigation would not affect consumers and households who need water, rather it would help increase the water available to them and that has to be a good thing.

We know that upping prices alters consumers’ behaviour so the impact on the farmers’ profit margins should send a clear message: save water and you’ll save money.

What About Food Security?

The only concern is that if the infrastructure to help farmers save water isn’t there, then farmers may just abandon their work and Jordan’s efforts to improve its food security would be halted.

Jordan was recently was rated the third among 18 countries which are considered at ‘extreme water-security risk’, so clearly something has to be done. We just need to make sure that suggestions are actually viable, that they improve normal people’s access to water and that they also don’t interfere with other self-sufficiency goals.

::Jordan Times

: Image via Ariful H Bhuiyan.

For more on Jordan water news see:

Jordan Signs Up For Epic ‘Sahara Forest Project’

Analyzing the Middle East Water Crisis: In Jordan, Israel and Beyond

Middle East Water Security Worries Prince of Jordan

 

Facebook Comments
Arwa Aburawa
Author: Arwa Aburawa

Arwa is a Muslim freelance writer who is interested in everything climate change related and how Islam can inspire more people to care for their planet and take active steps to save it while we can. She is endlessly suspicious of all politicians and their ceaseless meetings, especially as they make normal people believe that they are not part of the solution when they are the ONLY solution. Her Indian auntie is her model eco-warrier, and when Arwa is not busy helping out in the neighborhood alleyway garden, swap shopping or attempting fusion vegetarian dishes- with mixed success, she’d like to add- she can be found sipping on foraged nettle tea.

Comments

comments

Get featured on Green Prophet Send us tips and news:[email protected]

One thought on “The Best Way To Preserve Water? Make It More Expensive”

  1. Phil says:

    There is a fine line between providing incentives to farmers against the profligate inefficient use of water and the shameless profiteering of a small group of international water companies who seek to ‘educate through charging’.

    This approach of bringing in the UN then they outsource cosy lucrative deals to their favourite glbal water corporations funded through disgustingly high interest loans which turn developing nations into debt slaves of the banks should be avoided.

    An internal water education effort is the way to go.

Comments are closed.